Lesson 25: FIBONACCI TIME SEQUENCES
There is no sure way of using the time factor by itself in
forecasting. Frequently, however, time relationships based on the Fibonacci sequence go
beyond an exercise in numerology and seem to fit wave spans with remarkable accuracy,
giving the analyst added perspective. Elliott said that the time factor often
"conforms to the pattern" and therein lies its significance. In wave analysis,
Fibonacci time periods serve to indicate possible times for a turn, especially if they
coincide with price targets and wave counts.
In Nature's Law, Elliott gave the following examples
of Fibonacci time spans between important turning points in the market:
| 1921 to 1929 |
|
8 years |
| July 1921 to November 1928 |
|
89 months |
| September 1929 to July 1932 |
|
34 months |
| July 1932 to July 1933 |
|
13 months |
| July 1933 to July 1934 |
|
13 months |
| July 1934 to March 1937 |
|
34 months |
| July 1932 to March 1937 |
|
5 years (55 months) |
| March 1937 to March 1938 |
|
13 months |
| 1929 to 1942 |
|
13 years |
In Dow Theory Letters on November 21, 1973, Richard
Russell gave some additional examples of Fibonacci time periods:
| 1907 panic low to 1962 panic low |
|
55 years |
| 1949 major bottom to 1962 panic low |
|
13 years |
| 1921 recession low to 1942 recession low |
|
21 years |
| January 1960 top to October 1962 bottom |
|
34 months |
Taken in toto, these distances appear to be a bit
more than coincidence.
Walter E. White, in his 1968 monograph on the Elliott Wave
Principle, concluded that "the next important low point may be in 1970." As
substantiation, he pointed out the following Fibonacci sequence: 1949 + 21 = 1970; 1957 +
13 = 1970; 1962 + 8 = 1970; 1965 + 5 = 1970. May 1970, of course, marked the low point of
the most vicious slide in thirty years.
The progression of years from the 1928 (possible orthodox)
and 1929 (nominal) high of the last Supercycle produces a remarkable Fibonacci sequence as
well:
1929 + 3 = 1932 bear market bottom
1929 + 5 = 1934 correction bottom
1929 + 8 = 1937 bull market top
1929 + 13 = 1942 bear market bottom
1928 + 21 = 1949 bear market bottom
1928 + 34 = 1962 crash bottom
1928 + 55 = 1982 major bottom (1 year off)
A similar series has begun at the 1965 (possible orthodox)
and 1966 (nominal) highs of the third Cycle wave of the current Supercycle:
1965 + 1 = 1966 nominal high
1965 + 2 = 1967 reaction low
1965 + 3 = 1968 blowoff peak for secondaries
1965 + 5 = 1970 crash low
1966 + 8 = 1974 bear market bottom
1966 + 13 = 1979 low for 9.2 and 4.5 year cycles
1966 + 21 = 1987 high, low and crash
In applying Fibonacci time periods to the pattern of the
market, Bolton noted that time "permutations tend to become infinite" and that
time "periods will produce tops to bottoms, tops to tops, bottoms to bottoms or
bottoms to tops." Despite this reservation, he successfully indicated within the same
book, which was published in 1960, that 1962 or 1963, based on the Fibonacci sequence,
could produce an important turning point. 1962, as we now know, saw a vicious bear market
and the low of Primary wave [4], which preceded a virtually uninterrupted advance lasting
nearly four years.
In addition to this type of time sequence analysis, the
time relationship between bull and bear as discovered by Robert Rhea has proved useful in
forecasting. Robert Prechter, in writing for Merrill Lynch, noted in March 1978 that
"April 17 marks the day on which the A-B-C decline would consume 1931 market hours,
or .618 times the 3124 market hours in the advance of waves (1), (2) and (3)."
Friday, April 14 marked the upside breakout from the lethargic inverse head and shoulders
pattern on the Dow, and Monday, April 17 was the explosive day of record volume, 63.5
million shares. While this time projection did not coincide with the low, it did mark the
exact day when the psychological pressure of the preceding bear was lifted from the
market.
Benner's Theory
Samuel T. Benner had been an ironworks manufacturer until
the post Civil War panic of 1873 ruined him financially. He turned to wheat farming in
Ohio and took up the statistical study of price movements as a hobby to find, if possible,
the answer to the recurring ups and downs in business. In 1875, Benner wrote a book
entitled Business Prophecies of the Future Ups and Downs in Prices. The forecasts
contained in his book are based mainly on cycles in pig iron prices and the recurrence of
financial panics over a fairly considerable period of years. Benner's forecasts proved
remarkably accurate for many years, and he established an enviable record for himself as a
statistician and forecaster. Even today, Benner's charts are of interest to students of
cycles and are occasionally seen in print, sometimes without due credit to the originator.
Benner noted that the highs of business tend to follow a
repeating 8-9-10 yearly pattern. If we apply this pattern to high points in the Dow Jones
Industrial Average over the past seventy-five years starting with 1902, we get the
following results. These dates are not projections based on Benner's forecasts from
earlier years, but are only an application of the 8-9-10 repeating pattern applied in
retrospect.
| Year |
Interval |
Market Highs |
| 1902 |
|
April 24, 1902 |
| 1910 |
8 |
January 2, 1910 |
| 1919 |
9 |
November 3, 1919 |
| 1929 |
10 |
September 3, 1929 |
| 1937 |
8 |
March 10, 1937 |
| 1946 |
9 |
May 29, 1946 |
| 1956 |
10 |
April 6, 1956 |
| 1964 |
8 |
February 4, 1965 |
| 1973 |
9 |
January 11, 1973 |
With respect to economic low points, Benner
noted two series of time sequences indicating that recessions (bad times) and depressions
(panics) tend to alternate (not surprising, given Elliott's rule of alternation). In
commenting on panics, Benner observed that 1819, 1837, 1857 and 1873 were panic years and
showed them in his original "panic" chart to reflect a repeating 16-18-20
pattern, resulting in an irregular periodicity of these recurring events. Although he
applied a 20-18-16 series to recessions, or "bad times," less serious stock
market lows seem rather to follow the same 16-18-20 pattern as do major panic lows. By
applying the 16-18-20 series to the alternating stock market lows, we get an accurate fit,
as the Benner-Fibonacci Cycle Chart (Figure 4-17), first published in the 1967 supplement
to the Bank Credit Analyst, graphically illustrates.
Figure 4-17
Note that the last time the cycle configuration was the
same as the present was the period of the 1920s, paralleling the last occurrence of a
fifth Elliott wave of Cycle degree.
This formula, based upon Benner's idea of repeating series
for tops and bottoms, has worked reasonably well for most of this century. Whether the
pattern will always reflect future highs is another question. These are fixed cycles,
after all, not Elliott. Nevertheless, in our search for the reason for its satisfactory
fit with reality, we find that Benner's theory conforms reasonably closely to the
Fibonacci sequence in that the repeating series of 8-9-10 produces Fibonacci numbers up to
the number 377, allowing for a marginal difference of one point, as shown below.
8-9-10
Series |
|
Selected
Subtotals |
Fibonacci
Numbers |
Differences |
| 8 |
= |
8 |
8 |
0 |
| + 9 |
|
|
|
|
| +10 |
|
|
|
|
| + 8 |
= |
35 |
34 |
+1 |
| +9 |
|
|
|
|
| +10 |
= |
54 |
55 |
-1 |
| ...+ 8 |
= |
89 |
89 |
0 |
| ...+ 8 |
= |
143 |
144 |
-1 |
| ...+ 9 |
= |
233 |
233 |
0 |
| ...+10 |
= |
378 |
377 |
+1 |
Our conclusion is that Benner's theory,
which is based on different rotating time periods for bottoms and tops rather than
constant repetitive periodicities, falls within the framework of the Fibonacci sequence.
Had we no experience with the approach, we might not have mentioned it, but it has proved
useful in the past when applied in conjunction with a knowledge of Elliott Wave
progression. A.J. Frost applied Benner's concept in late 1964 to make the inconceivable
(at the time) prediction that stock prices were doomed to move essentially sideways for
the next ten years, raching a high in 1973 at about 1000 DJIA and a low in the 500 to 600
zone in late 1974 or early 1975. A letter sent by Forst to Hamilton Bolton at the time is
reproduced here. Figure 4-18 is a reproduction of the accompanying chart, complete with
notes. As the letter was dated December 10, 1964, it represents yet another long term
Elliott prediction which turned out to be more fact than fancy.
December 10, 1964
Mr. A.H. Bolton
Bolton, Tremblay, & Co.
1245 Sherbrooke Street West
Montreal 25, Quebec
Dear Hammy:
Now that we are well along in the current period of economic expansion
and gradually becoming vulnerable to changes in investment sentiment, it seems prudent to
polish the crystal ball and do a little hard assessing. In appraising trends, I have every
confidence in your bank credit approach except when the atmosphere becomes rarefied. I
cannot forget 1962. My feeling is that all fundamental tools are for the most part low
pressure instruments. Elliott, on the other hand, although difficult in its practical
application, does have special merit in high areas. For this reason, I have kept my eye
cocked on the Wave Principle and what I see now causes me some concern. As I read Elliott,
the stock market is vulnerable and the end of the major cycle from 1942 is upon us.
...I shall present my case to the effect that we are on dangerous ground
and that a prudent investment policy (if one can use a dignified word to express
undignified action) would be to fly to the nearest broker's office and throw everything to
the winds.
The third wave of the long rise from 1942, namely June 1949 to January
1960, represents an extension of primary cycles ...then the entire cycle from 1942 may
have reached its orthodox culmination point and what lies ahead of us now is probably a
double top and a long flat of Cycle dimension.
...applying Elliott's theory of alternation, the next three primary
moves should form a flat of considerable duration. It will be interesting to see if this
develops. In the meantime, I don't mind going out on the proverbial limb and making a
10-year projection as an Elliott theorist using only Elliott and Benner ideas. No
self-respecting analyst other than an Elliott man would do such a thing, but then that is
the sort of thing this unique theory inspires.
Best to you,
A. J. Frost
Figure 4-18
Although we have been able to codify ratio analysis
substantially as described in the first half of this chapter, there appear to be many ways
that the Fibonacci ratio is manifest in the stock market. The approaches suggested here
are merely carrots to whet the appetite of prospective analysts and set them on the right
track. Parts of the following chapters further explore the use of ratio analysis and give
perspective on its complexity, accuracy and applicability. Additional detailed examples
are presented in the Lessons 32 through 34. Obviously, the key is there. All that remains
is to discover how many doors it will unlock.
Next Lesson: Long Term Waves |