Lesson 27: THE WAVE PATTERN UP TO 1978
The Grand Supercycle from 1789
This long wave has the right look of three waves in the
direction of the main trend and two against the trend for a total of five, complete with
an extended third wave corresponding with the most dynamic and progressive period of U.S.
history. In Figure 5-2, the Supercycle subdivisions have been marked (I), (II), (III),
(IV) and (V).
Considering that we are exploring market history back to
the days of canal companies, horse-drawn barges and meager statistics, it is surprising
that the record of "constant dollar" industrial share prices, which was
developed by Gertrude Shirk for Cycles magazine, forms such a clear Elliott
pattern. Especially striking is the trend channel, the baseline of which connects several
important Cycle and Supercycle wave lows and the upper parallel of which connects the
peaks of several advancing waves.
Wave (I) is a fairly clear "five," assuming 1789
to be the beginning of the Supercycle. Wave (II) is a flat, which neatly predicts a zigzag
or triangle for wave (IV), by rule of alternation. Wave (III) is extended and can be
easily subdivided into the necessary five subwaves, including an expanding triangle
characteristically in the fourth Cycle wave position. Wave (IV), from 1929 to 1932,
terminates within the area of the fourth wave of lesser degree.
An inspection of wave (IV) in Figure 5-3 illustrates in
greater detail the zigzag of Supercycle dimension that marked the most devastating market
collapse in U.S. history. In wave A of the decline, daily charts show that the third
subwave, in characteristic fashion, included the Wall Street crash of October 29, 1929.
Wave A was then retraced approximately 50% by wave B, the "famous upward correction
of 1930," as Richard Russell terms
it, during which even Robert Rhea was led by the emotional nature of the rally to cover
his short positions. Wave C finally bottomed at 41.22, a drop of 253 points or about 1.382
times the length of wave A, and completed an 89 (a Fibonacci number) percent drop in stock
prices in three (another Fibonacci number) years.
Figure 5-2
Wave (V) of this Grand Supercycle is still in progress, [as
of 1978] and is further analyzed below.
The Supercycle Wave from 1932
Supercycle wave (V) has been in progress since 1932 and is
still unfolding (see Figure 5-3). If there were such a thing as a perfect wave formation
under the Wave Principle, this long term sequence of Elliott waves would be a prime
candidate. The breakdown of Cycle waves is as follows:
Wave I: 1932 to 1937 This wave is a clear cut
five-wave sequence according to the rules established by Elliott. It retraces .618 of the
market decline from the 1928 and 1930 highs and, within it, the extended fifth wave
travels 1.618 times the distance of the first through third waves.
Wave II: 1937 to 1942 Within wave II, subwave
[A] is a five, and wave [C] is a five, so the entire formation is a zigzag. Most of the
price damage occurs in wave [A]. Thus, there is great strength in the structure of the
entire corrective wave, much beyond what we would normally expect, as wave [C] travels
only slightly into new low ground for the correction. Most of the damage of wave [C] was
time based or erosive, as continued deflation pushed stock prices to price/earnings levels
which were below those even in 1932. A wave of this construction can have the power of a
flat.
Wave III: 1942 to 1965(6) This wave is an
extension, by which the Dow rose nearly 1000% in twenty-four years. Its principal features
are as follows:
1) Wave [4] is a flat, alternating with a zigzag, wave [2].
2) Wave [3] is the longest Primary wave and an extension.
3) Wave [4] corrects to near the top of the preceding
fourth wave of one lesser degree and holds well above the peak of wave [1].
4) The length of subwaves [1] and [5] are related by the
Fibonacci ratio in terms of percentage advance (129% and 80% respectively, where 80 = 129
x .618), as is often the case between two non-extended waves.
Wave IV: 1965(6) to 1974 In Figure 5-3, wave
IV bottoms in the area of wave [4], as is normal, and holds well above the peak of wave I.
Two possible interpretations are shown: a five-wave expanding triangle from February 1965
and a double three from January 1966. Both counts are admissible, although the triangle
interpretation might suggest a lower objective, where wave V would trace an advance
approximately as long as the widest part of the triangle. No other Elliott evidence,
however, suggests that such a weak wave is in the making. Some Elliott theorists attempt
to count the last decline from January 1973 to December 1974 as a five, thus labeling
Cycle wave IV a large flat. Our technical objections to a five-wave count are that the
supposed third subwave is too short, and the first wave is then overlapped by the fourth,
thereby offending two of Elliott's basic rules. It is clearly an A-B-C decline.
Figure 5-3
Wave V: 1974 to ? This wave of Cycle degree
is still unfolding. It is likely that two Primary waves have been completed at this
juncture and that the market is in the process of tracing out the third Primary, which
should accompany a break-
out to new all time highs. The last chapter will cover in somewhat more detail our
analysis and expectations with respect to the current market.
Thus, as we read Elliott, the current bull market in stocks
is the fifth wave from 1932 of the fifth wave from 1789 within an extended third wave from
the Dark Ages. Figure 5-4 gives the composite picture and speaks for itself.
Figure 5-4
The history of the West from the Dark Ages appears in
retrospect to have been an almost uninterrupted phase of human progress. The cultural rise
of Europe and North America, and before that the rise of the Greek city-states and the
expansion of the Roman Empire, and before that the thousand year wave of social progress
in Egypt, might be termed waves of Cultural degree, each of which was separated by
Cultural degree waves of stagnation and regress, each lasting centuries. One might argue
that even these five waves, constituting the entirety of recorded history to date, may
constitute a developing wave of Epochal degree, and that some period of social catastrophe
centuries hence (involving nuclear war, perhaps?) will ultimately ensure the occurrence of
the largest human social regress in five thousand years.
Of course, the theory of the spiraling Wave Principle
suggests that there exist waves of larger degree than Epochal. The ages in the development
of the species Homo sapiens might be waves of even higher degree. Perhaps Homo
sapiens himself is one stage in the development of hominids, which in turn are one stage
in the development of even larger waves in the progress of life on Earth. After all, if
the existence of the planet Earth is conceived to have lasted one year so far, life forms
emerged from the oceans five weeks ago, while manlike creatures have walked the Earth for
only the last six hours of the year, less than one one-hundredth of the total period
during which forms of life have existed. On this basis, Rome dominated the Western world
for a total of five seconds. Viewed from this perspective, a Grand Supercycle degree wave
is not really of such large degree after all.
Next Lesson: Individual Stocks |